FT App message triggered by sensor

Support
, ,
1

A simple question. I want FT App to give me a message if the Temperature of a sensor rises above X degrees. Is this really not possible through Automations??

2

This is possible if you set it up in tpflow.

Here is an example:

{
  "Id": "FNoWPSFpCjOIUyy",
  "ClassId": "FNoWPSFpCjOIUyy",
  "Author": "",
  "Version": 0,
  "CreatedAt": "2021-02-01T22:28:47.679450301+01:00",
  "UpdatedAt": "2021-02-01T22:28:47.679450301+01:00",
  "Name": "notifyOverXdegree",
  "Group": "test",
  "Description": "sends push notification over x degree",
  "Nodes": [
    {
      "Id": "1",
      "Type": "trigger",
      "Label": "Temp sensor",
      "SuccessTransition": "2",
      "TimeoutTransition": "",
      "ErrorTransition": "",
      "Address": "",
      "Service": "",
      "ServiceInterface": "",
      "Config": {
        "Timeout": 0,
        "ConnectorID": "",
        "ValueFilter": {
          "Value": null,
          "ValueType": ""
        },
        "PropFilterName": "",
        "PropFilterValue": "",
        "ValueJPath": "",
        "ValueJPathResultType": "",
        "InputVariableType": "",
        "IsValueFilterEnabled": false,
        "RegisterAsVirtualService": false,
        "LookupServiceNameAndLocation": false,
        "VirtualServiceGroup": "",
        "VirtualServiceProps": null
      },
      "Ui": {
        "x": 463,
        "y": 177,
        "nodeType": ""
      },
      "TypeAlias": "Trigger"
    },
    {
      "Id": "2",
      "Type": "if",
      "Label": "if over x degree",
      "Address": "",
      "Service": "",
      "ServiceInterface": "",
      "SuccessTransition": "",
      "ErrorTransition": "",
      "Config": {
        "TrueTransition": "3",
        "FalseTransition": "",
        "Expression": [
          {
            "Operand": "gt",
            "LeftVariableName": "",
            "LeftVariableIsGlobal": false,
            "RightVariable": {
              "Value": 20,
              "ValueType": "float"
            },
            "BooleanOperator": ""
          }
        ]
      },
      "Ui": {
        "x": 452,
        "y": 324,
        "nodeType": ""
      },
      "TypeAlias": "If condition"
    },
    {
      "Id": "3",
      "Type": "action",
      "Label": "Push notification",
      "Address": "pt:j1/mt:evt/rt:app/rn:kind_owl/ad:1",
      "Service": "kind-owl",
      "ServiceInterface": "evt.notification.report",
      "SuccessTransition": "",
      "ErrorTransition": "",
      "Config": {
        "VariableName": "",
        "IsVariableGlobal": false,
        "Props": {},
        "RegisterAsVirtualService": false,
        "VirtualServiceGroup": "",
        "VirtualServiceProps": {},
        "DefaultValue": {
          "Value": {
            "EventName": "custom",
            "MessageContent": "Temp sensor reports over 20*C",
            "SiteId": "f8976a62-a96c-4555-9af0-875a471eb74b"
          },
          "ValueType": "object"
        }
      },
      "Ui": {
        "x": 452,
        "y": 467,
        "nodeType": "notification_action"
      },
      "TypeAlias": "Notification"
    }
  ],
  "Settings": null,
  "IsDisabled": false,
  "IsDefault": false,
  "ParallelExecution": "parallel"
}
3

Jeg hadde jo håpet å unngå TPFlow for noe så enkelt som jeg mener burde være integrert i den vanlige regelmotoren, men takk for svar.

4

Jeg er enig at med alle mulighetene tpflow har, så er automasjonsbiten i appen litt for begrenset.
Det ønskes å utvide funksjonaliteten men er uvisst når det kommer